Bulky waste
Due to resource issues, we cannot take phone calls about bulky waste today, 25 April 2025. We apologise for any inconvenience.
December 2024
In February 2024, the local planning authorities of Adur District Council, Brighton & Hove City Council, Worthing Borough Council, and the South Downs National Park Authority (SDNPA) commissioned RRR Consultancy Ltd to undertake a Gypsy and Traveller Accommodation Assessment (GTAA) for the period 2024 to 2042.
The primary aim of the GTAA is to assess the accommodation needs of Gypsies, Travellers, and Travelling Showpeople. This will be in the Brighton & Hove, Adur, and Worthing local planning authority areas, the parts of the SDNPA within those local authority administrative areas, as well as in the parts of the National Park not covered by an up-to-date GTAA, specifically the Chichester and Arun districts (the ‘study area’), in compliance with PPTS.
Additionally, the GTAA incorporates and updates the accommodation needs from previously conducted GTAAs for areas within and outside the South Downs National Park (see Chapters 5, 6 and 7).
The GTAA acknowledges that there are ‘van dwellers’ residing in the study area. Van dwellers are individuals or households who live in vehicles, such as vans, converted trucks, or motorhomes, as their primary residence.
Unlike members of the Gypsy, Traveller, or Travelling Showpeople communities, van dwellers typically do not adhere to a nomadic or culturally distinct lifestyle tied to historical traditions.
Various factors, including economic necessity, lifestyle preferences, or a desire for mobility and flexibility, can drive their choice of living in vehicles.
Van dwellers often reside on the outskirts of cities, rural areas, or temporary sites and may not be formally recognised within traditional planning or accommodation assessments.
This assessment focuses specifically on members of the Gypsy and Traveller communities (including ‘New Travellers’) and Travelling Showpeople. Anecdotal evidence from stakeholder consultations indicates that most van dwellers do not fall into these categories and are therefore not included in the main assessment. However, they are considered in the stakeholder consultation discussed in Chapter 4 and are addressed in the recommendations.
This report identifies the accommodation needs for Gypsy and Traveller pitches (Chapter 5) and Showpeople plots (Chapter 6) within the SDNP local planning authority (LPA) area and provides a breakdown for each council's administrative area, including (commissioning local authorities asterisked):
The accommodation needs for Gypsy and Traveller pitches (Chapter 5) and Travelling Showpeople plots (Chapter 6) are assessed for the commissioning local planning authority areas outside of the SDNP LPA:
The results will be used as an evidence base for policy development in housing and planning and supersede any previous GTAA (including any levels of accommodation needs calculated prior to this assessment) published for the study local planning authorities. The base date for the report is August 2024.
The requirement to assess the accommodation needs of Gypsies and Travellers, and Showpeople, is established through national guidance contained in ‘Planning Policy for Traveller Sites’ (PPTS) (Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government (MHCLG), December 2024).
As discussed further in Chapter 2, PPTS 2024 (see paragraphs 2.3 to 2.8) retains the definition of Gypsies and Travellers used in the PPTS 2023 (this change was in response to a Court of Appeal judgment in the case of Smith v SSLUHC & Others (October 2022).
PPTS 2024 requires local planning authorities to assess the accommodation needs of Gypsy, Traveller, and Travelling Showpeople households who have either a cultural tradition of nomadism or a cultural tradition of living in a caravan.
To achieve the study aims, the research drew on several data sources including:
The above provided an extensive range of quantitative and qualitative data enabling a robust and reliable assessment of accommodation needs.
On 12 December 2024, the government announced changes to Planning Policy for Traveller Sites (PPTS), previously updated in December 2023. Like the 2023 update, the 2024 version will be read with the National Planning Policy Framework (2024).
Whilst it is clear that PPTS 2024 determines the need to assess the accommodation needs of households who have ceased to travel temporarily or permanently due to their family’s or dependants’:
It does not explicitly state how the new definition should be interpreted concerning other factors such as whether families travel for economic or work purposes.
Given differences in defining Gypsies and Travellers, this GTAA provides two accommodation needs figures:
The two accommodation needs definitions are discussed in more detail in Chapter 2
In March 2016, the Department of Communities and Local Government (DCLG) published its Review of housing needs for caravans and houseboats: draft guidance to local housing authorities on the periodical review of housing needs for caravans and houseboats.
It states that, when considering the need for caravans and houseboats, local authorities must include the needs of a variety of residents in differing circumstances including, for example, caravan and houseboat dwelling households and households residing in bricks and mortar dwelling households.
It should be noted that this GTAA does not consider the accommodation needs of houseboats.
According to the NPPF (2024) and related planning practice guidance, a sound local plan seeks, as a minimum, to meet the area’s objectively assessed needs, and address the needs of groups with specific housing requirements.
The NPPF (2024) refers to the need to both assess and then address the accommodation needs of those who are ethnically recognised Gypsies and Travellers (as in line with the Equality Act 2010), both of whom are covered by the definition of the PPTS 2024, and those outside of the definition.
The 2021 Census suggests there were 1,405 people recorded as Gypsies and Travellers residing in the West Sussex and Brighton & Hove area. This represents around 0.12% of the usual resident population. This is slightly above the average for England of 0.11%.
A fifth (20%) of Gypsy and Traveller households who completed the 2021 Census reside in a caravan or mobile home, with the remaining four-fifths (80%) residing in bricks and mortar accommodation.
There were 553 caravans recorded in West Sussex and Brighton & Hove by the January 2024 Caravan Count. The 553 caravans recorded in January 2024 included:
In relation to density, Crawley and Worthing did not record any caravans as part of the Government’s January 2024 Traveller Caravan Count. Brighton & Hove recorded 10 caravans per 100,000 population. Mid Sussex 21, Arun 22, Adur 25, Horsham 111, and Chichester 224.
On average, over half (53%) of authorised caravans recorded in West Sussex and Brighton & Hove from July 2021 to January 2024 were in Chichester, a quarter (25%) in Horsham, and a tenth (10%) in Arun. Smaller proportions were recorded in Mid Sussex (8%), Brighton & Hove (7%), Adur (4%), and Worthing (0%).
West Sussex County Council and Brighton & Hove City Council keep detailed records of unauthorised encampments.
There were 151 unauthorised encampments recorded between Quater 1 (April to June) 2021 to 2022 and Quater 4 (January to March) 2023 to 2024.
On average, 13 unauthorised encampments per quarter were recorded in the study area, with a minimum of no unauthorised encampments taking place in Quater 3 2021 to 2022 and Quater 4 2022 to 2023, peaking at 38 unauthorised encampments recorded in Quater 1 2021 to 2022.
The number of unauthorised encampments recorded in the study area declined between Quater 1 2021 to 2022 and Quater 4 2023 to 2024.
On average, each unauthorised lasted 5 days and consisted of 8 vehicles. Just under a third (30%) of unauthorised encampments took place in Brighton & Hove, around a quarter (26%) in Chichester, an eighth (13%) in Arun, a tenth (10%) in Horsham, and smaller proportions in Worthing (9%), Adur (7%), and (4%) in Mid Sussex.
Consultations using an online survey with a range of stakeholders were conducted to provide qualitative information about the accommodation needs of Gypsies, Travellers, and Travelling Showpeople.
The primary accommodation challenges for Gypsies, Travellers, and Travelling Showpeople in the local area stem from a significant shortage of available sites, both permanent and temporary, which hampers families' ability to establish a stable living environment.
As more residents express a desire to transition from nomadic traditions to a settled lifestyle, the difficulty of securing plots on local authority sites becomes increasingly evident due to high demand and limited provisions.
Internal family growth and external pressure drive the demand for new accommodations. Natural expansion within households creates a growing need for additional pitches, which current supplies cannot meet.
Family cohesion is culturally vital, with young families traditionally setting up homes near their parents. This practice requires new pitches or larger plots to accommodate growth within localities, facilitating better access to essential services like education and healthcare.
Tables ES1 to ES4 summarise the permanent accommodation needs for Gypsy and Traveller pitches from 2024 to 2042. Tables ES5 and ES6 cover the accommodation needs for Travelling Showpeople.
It is important to note that the figures in these tables include all identified needs as of 2024, including those from previous GTAAs that have not yet been met by the time of this assessment.
The ethnic need refers to all members of the Gypsy and Traveller communities, with the PPTS need being a subset that includes only those who meet the PPTS definition within the ethnic group.
Area | 2024 to 2029 | 2029 to 2034 | 2034 to 2039 | 2039 to 2042 | Total Need |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Adur | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Arun | 11 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 16 |
Brighton and Hove | 8 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 13 |
Chichester | 11 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 14 |
Worthing | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 3 |
East Hampshire | 6 | 2 | 5 | 1 | 14 |
East Sussex(Lewes) | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 6 |
Horsham | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Mid Sussex | 2 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 7 |
Winchester | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Total Need | 43 | 10 | 12 | 8 | 73 |
Area | 2024 to 2029 | 2029 to 2034 | 2034 to 2039 | 2039 to 2042 | Total Need |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Adur | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Arun | 10 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 15 |
Brighton and Hove | 7 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 11 |
Chichester | 11 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 14 |
Worthing | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 3 |
East Hampshire | 5 | 2 | 4 | 1 | 12 |
East Sussex(Lewes) | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 4 |
Horsham | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Mid Sussex | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 3 |
Winchester | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Total Need | 36 | 8 | 11 | 7 | 62 |
Area | 2024 to 2029 | 2029 to 2034 | 2034 to 2039 | 2039 to 2042 | Total Need |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Adur | 7 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 11 |
Brighton and Hove | 6 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 7 |
Worthing | 4 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 5 |
Total Need | 17 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 23 |
Area | 2024 to 2029 | 2029 to 2034 | 2034 to 2039 | 2039 to 2042 | Total Need |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Adur | 3 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 7 |
Brighton and Hove | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Worthing | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Total Need | 3 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 7 |
Area | 2024 to 2029 | 2029 to 2034 | 2034 to 2039 | 2039 to 2042 | Total Need |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Adur | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 |
Arun | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Brighton and Hove | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Chichester | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Worthing | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
East Hampshire | 5 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 9 |
East Sussex(Lewes) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Horsham | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Mid Sussex | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Winchester | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Total | 6 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 11 |
Area | 2024 to 2029 | 2029 to 2034 | 2034 to 2039 | 2039 to 2042 | Total Need |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Adur | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Brighton and Hove | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Worthing | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Total | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Whilst recognising the existing transit provision within the study area, it is recommended that the local planning authorities adopt a negotiated stopping policy.
This involves caravans being sited on suitable specific pieces of ground for an agreed and limited period, with the provision of limited services such as water, waste disposal and toilets.
The advantages of this approach are set out in detail in Chapter 7.
Need Category | Total Need |
---|---|
Ethnic | 73 |
PPTS 2024 | 62 |
Area | Total Need |
---|---|
Adur | 11 |
Brighton and Hove | 7 |
Worthing | 5 |
Total | 23 |
Area | Total Need |
---|---|
Adur | 7 |
Brighton and Hove | 0 |
Worthing | 0 |
Total | 7 |
Area | Total Need |
---|---|
SDNP | 11 |
Area | Total Need |
---|---|
Adur | 0 |
Brighton and Hove | 0 |
Worthing | 0 |
Total | 0 |
This GTAA recommends adopting the ‘ethnic’ definition accommodation needs figures, i.e meeting the accommodation needs of all households who ethnically identify as Gypsies and Travellers.
This will not only demonstrate knowledge of the overall accommodation need of all Gypsies and Travellers, but also how the accommodation needs in relation to households not meeting the PPTS definition are being addressed.
It is also recommended that the local planning authorities consider the accommodation needs that might materialise over the plan period from households (Gypsies, Travellers and Travelling Showpeople), i.e. following the publication of this assessment.
This could include households residing on unauthorised developments, unauthorised encampments, new households due to in-migration, and those residing in bricks and mortar accommodation and van dwellers.
This accommodation need should be considered separate to the need identified below and could be met through windfall applications.
In addition to the above in order to meet the specific accommodation need of the different community groups, the report recommends the following:
As well as quantifying accommodation need, the study also makes recommendations on other key issues for the respective councils to individually and collectively to consider, including: